For scans that use ionising radiation (X-ray, CT, nuclear medicine), the only long-term concern is a very small possible increase in lifetime cancer risk — and at the low doses used, this hasn't been clearly demonstrated; it's estimated cautiously from higher-dose situations. Ultrasound and MRI have no ionising-radiation risk. For any single needed scan, the benefit almost always outweighs this small theoretical risk.
Key takeaways
- The long-term concern is a very small possible increase in cancer risk.
- At low imaging doses, this risk hasn't been clearly demonstrated.
- It's estimated cautiously from higher-dose exposures.
- Ultrasound and MRI carry no ionising-radiation risk.
When it comes to the long-term risks of imaging, it helps to separate the scans that use radiation from those that don’t.
Only some scans carry a radiation risk
Ultrasound and MRI use no ionising radiation, so they carry no radiation-related long-term risk.[2] The discussion of long-term risk applies only to scans that do use radiation — X-ray, CT and nuclear medicine.
A small, theoretical cancer risk
For those scans, the only recognised long-term concern is a very small possible increase in lifetime cancer risk from the radiation dose.[2] Two points keep this in perspective:
- At the low doses used in most imaging, this increase has not been clearly demonstrated — it’s hard to detect against the roughly 1-in-2 lifetime cancer risk we all carry anyway.
- The risk is estimated cautiously, by extrapolating down from situations involving much higher doses (such as atomic-bomb survivors). This deliberately errs on the side of safety.[2]
Higher-dose studies (like CT) carry a larger estimated risk than a simple X-ray, which is why they’re justified more carefully.[1]
Benefit almost always wins
For any single, genuinely needed scan, the benefit — a correct diagnosis, the right treatment, avoiding something worse — almost always outweighs the small theoretical risk.[1] The risk matters most across populations and repeated scans, which is why imaging is used thoughtfully rather than routinely.
Frequently asked questions
Will a scan give me cancer?
For a single needed scan the risk is very small and theoretical — at low doses it hasn’t been clearly shown, and the benefit almost always outweighs it. Ultrasound and MRI carry no such risk.[2]
Why is the risk described as “theoretical”?
Because at the low doses used in imaging, an increase in cancer hasn’t been clearly measured. The risk is estimated cautiously from higher-dose exposures, erring on the side of safety.[2]
Are non-radiation scans completely risk-free?
They carry no radiation risk. Ultrasound and MRI have excellent safety records; MRI has its own precautions (metal, the magnet) but no ionising-radiation risk.[2]
Sources
- RadiologyInfo.org (RSNA & ACR) — Radiation Dose from X-Ray and CT Exams — www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info/safety-xray
- RANZCR / InsideRadiology — Radiation risk of medical imaging — www.insideradiology.com.au/radiation-risk/



